|
The analysis of the top-100 outsourcing deals for 2004 just released by IDC, reflect increased competition and expansion in the marketplace, and create pressure for traditional outsourcers to alter their business models to compete in the coming years.
The research firm found a dramatic shift to more BPO, an increase in the number of players, and a reduction in total deal value.
The value of the top 100 outsourcing deals in 2004 decreased by 1.2 percent from $69.1 billion in 2003 to $68.3 billion in 2004, according to the report. The study also found that the share of BPO and processing services deals in the top-100 outsourcing deals increased from 15.2 percent in 2003 to 25 percent in 2004, while the share of IT outsourcing services suffered a decline to 75 percent of the 2004 market.
"We're starting to see a second wave of firms moving to outsourcing," says Paul Horowitz, partner, outsource advisory leader for PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York. "We expect to see the number of jobs overseas double in the next 10 years. The primary question from firms now isn't what to outsource, but what not to offshore, according to Horowitz.
The study found that the number of players participating in the top-100 deals increased from 26 in 2003 to 34 in 2004. While just three players captured 55.6 percent of the contract value for these deals in 2003, seven were needed to reach roughly the same amount (55.9 percent) in 2004, with IBM leading the way, followed by CSC, EDS, Atos Origin, HP, Accenture, and Fujitsu.
The value of deals captured by Asia-Pacific based contracts showed a jump from 0.7 percent of total deal value in 2003 to 3.9 percent in 2004. European-based players, increased their take of these deals from 21.7 percent in 2003 to 38.9 percent in 2004, while America's vendors saw a decrease from 76.7 percent to 56.3 percent during this same period.
There is increasing pressure at shareholder meetings to outsource more positions overseas, Horowitz says. "More firms are moving more stuff overseas. I think we're just seeing the tip of the iceberg. While everyone is [outsourcing] or thinking about it, I'm surprised by how many firms that haven't done it that are name-brand firms."
|